Legal Opinion

Underwriters Insurance v. Purdie

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1983No. Civ. 67097PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

In this case we deal with a dispute concerning coverage provided by the liability provisions of a multiperil liability insurance policy for a shooting incident on the insured premises of a liquor store. The trial court, in a declaratory relief action initiated by the insurance carrier, determined the firearm exclusion indorsement to the insurance policy precluded coverage. Judgment was entered declaring the insurance carrier has no duty to defend or indemnify the insured or its employee against the claim of third parties, Walter Atkinson and his wife, Casandra Atkinson, for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Haynes v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mendoza v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. American National Fire Insurance Company v. Mark C. HungerfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Cal-Farm Insurance v. TAC Exterminators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API