Legal Opinion
Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of Education
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 21, 1995PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BROCHIN, J.A.D.
Plaintiffs own and farm property in Vineland, New Jersey.1 Their crops and farmland have been damaged by flooding which, *324they claim, was caused by the improper siting and construction of a public high school across the street from their property. They instituted the present action to obtain compensation for the damage.
The defendants who are parties to this appeal are the Vineland Board of Education, Glenn A. Kahley, Art Anderson, Inc., and the City of Vineland. Plaintiffs allege that the Board of Education is liable to compensate them…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- W v. Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Polyard v. TerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Harrison v. Middlesex Water CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Birchwood Lakes Colony Club, Inc. v. Borough of Medford LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Greenway Development Co. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Pinkowski v. Township of MontclairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Klumpp v. Borough of AvalonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- 287 Corporate Center Associates v. The Township of Bridgewater, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.