Legal Opinion
287 Corporate Center Associates v. The Township of Bridgewater, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 27, 1996No. 95-5164PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
In this inverse condemnation action, 287 Corporate Center Associates (“Associates”) sued the Township of Bridgewater (“Township”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution for allegedly taking its property without just compensation. The district court dismissed the ease as time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. Associates has appealed. We will affirm.
I
The district court had subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review is plenary.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Heard v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Eileen Cowell v. Palmer TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Conway v. 287 Corporate Center AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.