Legal Opinion
Independence One Mortgage Corp. v. Katsaros
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 10, 1996No. 15535PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiff Independence One Mortgage Corporation appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court. The plaintiff claims that, in determining that the mortgage of the defendant1 Larry Lainey was prior in right to its mortgage, the trial court improperly failed to apply the doc*72trine of equitable subrogation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. The dispute about priority of mortgages arose during the foreclosure action instituted by the plaintiff. The subject property was previously owned by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Connecticut National Bank v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Reynolds v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- East Boston Savings Bank v. OganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Houston v. Bank of America Federal Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. RobertsKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Rosenblit v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Hudson Valley Bank v. KisselSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.