Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. Isacs
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiff is not described in the writ as acting in a representative capacity, but throughout the pleadings and in the finding it is described as “The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Trustee.” Inasmuch as the judgment finds the issues for the plaintiff and reinstates the original mortgage given “to the plaintiff,” and the complaint alleges that the mortgage was given to the Lomas & Nettleton Company, trustee, which,allegation is admitted in the answer, the judgment must be held to be in favor of the Lomas & Nettleton Company as trustee. No question was raised in the proceedings before trial,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Bruse v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Cobb v. DyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
- Campbell v. TrotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- In Re TorontoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Beach v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.