Legal Opinion

Ward v. Zeugner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1964No. 37159PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff, the favored driver under the provisions of RCW 46.60.160, initiated this action to recover damages arising out of an intersection collision with defendants’ vehicle. Defendants counterclaimed. From a verdict denying recovery to both parties, plaintiff appeals.

The accident occurred at 3 p.m. on January 14, 1963, at the intersection of Alder Street and North 24th Street in Tacoma, Washington; Alder Street being a north-south, 30 mile an hour arterial, 48 feet in width. Plaintiff was proceeding north and defendants’ vehicle, driven by defendant wife, was traveling south on Alder…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Cook v. SeidenvergWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Mondor v. RhoadesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Kelsey v. PollockWashington Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Bauman v. ComplitaWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Bohnsack v. KirkhamWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pratt v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API