Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Complita

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1965No. 37783PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is a controlled intersection collision case in which the favored driver (and his wife) 1 secured a judgment, based on the verdict of a jury, against the disfavored driver (and his employer). The defendants appeal.

Only two questions are presented on the appeal. The primary question is: Should a new trial be granted because the trial court refused to submit the issue of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence to the jury?

The secondary question is: If a new trial is granted, should it be limited solely to the issue of liability (or, even more narrowly, solely to the issue of contributory…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Owens v. KuroWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Baxter v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ward v. ZeugnerWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Chadwick v. EkWashington Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bertsch v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bohnsack v. KirkhamWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Tobias v. RainwaterWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. France v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hough v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API