Legal Opinion
United States v. Kane
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 2000No. Crim.A. 98-541PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Michael Kane’s motion for a downward departure from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range for extraordinary rehabilitation. On March 23, 2000, the court held a hearing and ruled from the bench that the defendant merited a downward departure to a sentence of 120 months imprisonment.
Background
On April 19, 1999, Michael Kane pled guilty before this court to two counts of distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On two occasions in 1998, he sold a total of five ounces of methamphetamine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Albert Sally, A/K/A "Pj" Albert SallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Juan FaulksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Wayne Herman and Van Talley, Raulo JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. JaramilloDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nolan Leigh Mendenhall, in No. 00-1500Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. LangeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- United States v. HancockDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- United States v. HawkinsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- United States v. OrtizDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.