Legal Opinion
United States v. Jaramillo
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 13, 1998No. CRIM. A. 95-387(AJL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
After a jury trial, defendant Dario Jaramil-lo (“Jaramillo”) was found guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. After sentencing, Jaramillo appealed and argued, inter alia, he had improperly received a two-point upward adjustment for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 (“Section 3C1.1”). While the appeal was pending, the Circuit decided United States v. Arnold, 106 F.3d 37 (3d Cir.1997), which set forth requirements for upward enhancements pursuant to Section 3C1.1. Because…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Thekkedajh Peethamb MenonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Albert Sally, A/K/A "Pj" Albert SallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. James Allen KapitzkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Charles Randell GreerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. KaneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- United States v. HancockDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- BURNETT v. OCEAN PROPERTIES LTDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.