United States v. Caver
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLISON, Senior Judge:
The principal issue in this appeal from a special court-martial conviction is whether the appellant’s pleas of guilty to the offenses of indecent language and communicating a threat were providently entered. We conclude that they were and affirm.
Background
Pursuant to a pretrial plea bargain, the appellant pled guilty to disrespect to a chief petty officer, larceny, wrongful appropria*559tion, unlawful entry, kidnapping, indecent language, communicating a threat, and drunk and disorderly conduct in violation of Articles 91, 121, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. MurrayUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. BivinsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. GreenArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. PerkinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. SanchezArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.