Legal Opinion
Cresco, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 23, 1993No. 92 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
This is a petition for review filed by Cresco Inc. (Cresco) and Saturn Cab Company (collectively, petitioners) from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), entered on December 18, 1991, which revoked Cresco’s certificate of public convenience.
In 1990, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Code was amended to provide for a medallion system of regulation for taxicabs in first class cities. 1 Pursuant thereto, the PUC established procedures whereby taxicabs operating under PUC certificates of public convenience could obtain medallions. 2 A subsequent order,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Soja v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Lehigh Valley Power Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- SME Bessemer Cement, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- White Oak Borough Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jubelirer v. SingelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Fountain Capital Fund, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Securities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Honey Brook Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Dee-Dee Cab, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Loma, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.