Legal Opinion
Robson v. Rodriquez
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 28, 1958PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pboctor, J.
The primary question raised by this appeal is the constitutional validity of N. J. 8. A. 39:6-70(<í) of the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Eund Law, L. 1952, c. 174 (N. J. 8. A. 39:6-61 et seq.) which precludes a person who sustains personal injury or property damage caused by a financially irresponsible motorist from receiving payment out of the Eund, if at the time of the accident he was operating or riding in an uninsured motor vehicle owned by him, or his spouse, parent or child.
The plaintiff is the administrator ad prosequendum of Mary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Independent Warehouses, Inc. v. ScheeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
3Cited by103 opinions
- Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Township of Mahwah v. Bergen County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. HaliskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Piscataway Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. CaffieroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.