Legal Opinion

MacClements v. LaFone

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1991No. 9026SC951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict.

In passing upon a defendant’s motion for directed verdict, the plaintiff’s “evidence must be taken as true,. .. and [the motion] may be granted only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiffs.” Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576, 583, 201 S.E.2d 897, 902 (1974).

Mazza v. Huffaker, 61 N.C. App. 170, 174, 300 S.E.2d 833, 836, review denied, 309 N.C. 192, 305 S.E.2d 734 (1983). If all the essential elements of actionable negligence tend to be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. State v. CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Gregory v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. McCracken v. Walls-KaufmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Doe Ex Rel Roe v. Madison Center HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Bladen v. First Presbyterian Church of SallisawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Johnson v. Amethyst Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API