Smith International, Inc., Etc. v. Hughes Tool Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals challenge orders of the United States District Court for the Central District of California that (1) refused to dissolve a preliminary injunction against patent infringement, (2) denied a motion for summary judgment that the patents are invalid because they had been procured by fraud on the Patent Office or are unenforceable because the patentee’s action before that Office constituted inequitable conduct, and (3) barred the infringer in the relief phase of the case from introducing any evidence relating to the latter contention. We affirm in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- John J. Terrell, Plaintiff-Appelle v. Household Goods Carriers' BureauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Garlock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Intergraph Corporation v. Intel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- The Toro Company v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc. And Wci Outdoor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.