Legal Opinion
The Toro Company v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc. And Wci Outdoor Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 22, 2004No. 03-1424PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
The Toro Company (“Toro”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota granting summary judgment of non-infringement of United States Patent No. 4,694,-528 (“the '528 patent”) in favor of White Consolidated Industries, Inc., and WCI Outdoor Products, Inc. (collectively “White”). Toro Co. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc., No. 4-95-656 (DWF/AJB), 2003 WL 21147769 (D.Minn. May 14, 2003) (“Opinion”). Because this court’s previous claim construction is law of the case, and because the district court correctly held that the disclosure of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Township of Saddle Brook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Drilling Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.