Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Spokane United Railways Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1933No. 24504. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage. The cause came on for trial before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof to sustain a verdict and moved for a nonsuit; which motion was sustained. From the judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiff appeals.

The facts are these: The accident out of which the litigation arose happened in the city of Spokane, October 13, 1931, at about 7:30 o ’clock a. m., on Howard street, at or near a place where the steam railway tracks cross…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Steinheim v. NicholasWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. DuraliaOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Kitchen v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poland v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McBeath v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Weinman v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API