Legal Opinion
Cargill, Inc. v. Hedge
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 4, 1984No. C2-84-445PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The trial court found that respondents were entitled to claim a homestead exemption on land which they assigned to their family farm corporation and the creditor, which sought execution on its judgment, appealed. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondents Sam Hedge and Annette Hedge, husband and wife, purchased the 160 acres at issue here on a contract for deed in 1973, and since that time have farmed the land and used it as their home. The family farm corporation, respondent Hedge Farm, Inc., was formed, and respondents Sam Hedge and Annette Hedge assigned their purchaser’s interest in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Wilder v. HaugheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Kaser v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- In re Emerson's HomesteadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bergquist v. Anderson-Greenwood Aviation Corp. (In Re Bellanca Aircraft Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Cargill, Inc. v. HedgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State Bank in Eden Valley v. Euerle Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re SmoinikarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- In the Matter of the Estate of: Rosalie S. Allard, Decedent.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015