Frederick v. Swift Transportation Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge.
Before the court is Swift Transportation Co., Inc.’s (“Swift”) motion to exclude the testimony of Terry and Donna Fredericks’ (“Fredericks”) expert. Art Atkinson (Docs. 212, 213). A response has been filed and the matter is ripe for decision. (Doc. 234). A Daubert hearing was held on November 3, 2008. Swift’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part for the reasons stated more fully herein.
I. FACTS
This is a personal injury action arising out of a tractor-trailer collision. Freder-icks have asserted several claims including: 1) Swift’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Bitler v. A.O. Smith Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hennessey v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023