Legal Opinion

Paul v. Missouri State Life Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an action to recover upon tbe total permanent disability clause in a life insurance policy. The policy was issued by the defendant to plaintiff on October 1, 1927, under a group insurance arrangement with the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, by whom plaintiff was employed as a boiler maker helper. The case was tried before the court without the aid of a jury, and upon an agreed statement of facts, resulting in a judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

The material portion of the policy sued upon reads as follows:

“If the Employee shall furnish the Company due proof that before…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Richards v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Ass'n v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Boillot v. Income Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. General American Life Ins. Co. v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API