State v. . Bridgers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ClabksoN, J".
The defendant concedes that the city of Rocky Mount may lawfully tax any business, trade, or profession carried on or enjoyed within its corporate limits, which is not otherwise prohibited by the general laws of the State; but contends that C. S., 7880 (51), paragraphs e and g (Public Laws N. C., 1935, ch. 371, sec. 121 [e] and [g]), prohibits the city of Rocky Mount from collecting the tax in controversy. "We cannot so hold.
In S. v. Langston, 88 N. C., 692 (694), the law is well settled, as follows: “The power conferred upon the municipal body is presumed to be in subordination…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. . LangstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Hilton v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Southeastern Express Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Automotive Trade Association v. . SheriffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Riddle v. . LedbetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- C. D. Kenny Co. v. Town of BrevardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Weinstein v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Weinstein v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.