C. D. Kenny Co. v. Town of Brevard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The power of the General Assembly to tax trades, professions and franchises (Const., Art. V, sec. 3) was by ch. 62 of the Code, sec. 3800 (now C. S., 2677), delegated to municipal corporations, and they were empowered to “lay a tax on all trades, professions and franchises carried on or enjoyed within the city, unless otherwise provided by law.” S. v. Worth, 116 N. C., 1007, 21 S. E., 204; Rosenbaum v. New Bern, 118 N. C., 83, 24 S. E., 1; Guano Co. v. Tarboro, 126 N. C., 68, 35 S. E., 231; Cotton Mills v. Waxhaw, 130 N. C., 293, 41 S. E., 488; Drug Co. v. Lenoir, 160 N. C., 571, 76 S. E.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roach v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Duffin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Rosenbaum v. . New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Equitable Assurance Co. of NY v. GoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Hajoca Corporation v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- IMT, Inc. v. City of LumbertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Hajoca Corporation v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Snyder v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.