Legal Opinion

Southeastern Express Co. v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

The .plaintiff paid the tax levied by the city, in accordance with the statute, and sued to recover the money. C. S., 7979.

This suit is brought on the ground that defendant has levied and collected from plaintiff the sum of seventy-five dollars ($75), the maximum privilege or license tax provided for in “An Act to Baise Bevenue,” same being “The Public Laws of North Carolina for the Year 1921,” sections 79 and 79 a. That in addition to the privilege of license tax levied and collected as aforesaid, the defendant, under an ordinance known as the Bevenue Ordinance of the City of Charlotte, has…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Lacy v. . Packing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. State v. . StevensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Wayne Mercantile Co. v. Commissioners of Mount OliveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Viquesney v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. State v. . LockeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Wheeler v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. State v. . BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API