Weinstein v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.
Plaintiff paid tbe junk dealers’ license tax levied by tbe defendant, city of Raleigh, under protest and brought this action to recover same. N. C. Code, 1939 (Micbie), sec. 1919.
This action has been before this Court heretofore. Weinstein v. Raleigh, 218 N. C., 549. It was there held: “Where in an action against a municipality upon an agreed statement of facts to recover a license tax paid under protest, tbe facts agreed are ambiguous and conflicting so that it is not clear whether tbe right to levy tbe tax was asserted upon tbe ground that plaintiff was carrying on tbe business specified…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Johnston.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Hilton v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Weinstein v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940