Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City Corp. v. Cahoon & Maxfield Irrigation Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1994No. 930293PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

Cahoon and Maxfield Irrigation Company (the Irrigation Company) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Salt Lake City Corporation and Sandy City Corporation. We reverse and remand.

PACTS

The underlying dispute in this case arises out of two initially unrelated and separate purchases of Irrigation Company stock by Salt Lake City and Sandy City. Relying on a restriction contained in its articles of incorporation, the Irrigation Company refused to register and transfer to either Salt Lake City or Sandy City any of the stock involved in these purchases.

O…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jacobucci v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. Genola Town v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Smithfield West Bench Irr. Co. v. Union Central Life Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Center Creek Water & Irrigation Co. v. LindsayUtah Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sevy v. Security Title Co. of Southern UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Allen v. CoatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Matthews v. Wenatchee Heights Water Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API