Legal Opinion

Keithly v. Lacey

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1946No. Civ. 15420PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Defendant has appealed from an order denying his motion for a change of venue from Los Angeles County to Inyo County where he resides.

Respondents allege in their complaint that appellant holds in trust for them an undivided one-half interest in real property in Los Angeles, Tulare and Inyo Counties, personal property consisting of ten first mortgage bonds having a par value of $1,000 each, a recorded livestock and cattle brand, and $8,000 in cash. They pray for a decree establishing the trust and directing defendant to execute such conveyances as shall be necessary to convey to plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. McFarland v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Eckstrand v. WilshusenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quick v. CorsaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. United Nuclear Corp. v. FortNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Gilman v. NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. All-Cool Aluminum Awning Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Miller v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API