Keithly v. Lacey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Defendant has appealed from an order denying his motion for a change of venue from Los Angeles County to Inyo County where he resides.
Respondents allege in their complaint that appellant holds in trust for them an undivided one-half interest in real property in Los Angeles, Tulare and Inyo Counties, personal property consisting of ten first mortgage bonds having a par value of $1,000 each, a recorded livestock and cattle brand, and $8,000 in cash. They pray for a decree establishing the trust and directing defendant to execute such conveyances as shall be necessary to convey to plaintiffs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McFarland v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Eckstrand v. WilshusenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quick v. CorsaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- United Nuclear Corp. v. FortNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gilman v. NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- All-Cool Aluminum Awning Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Miller v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.