Legal Opinion

Seattle-First National Bank v. Cannon

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 24, 1980No. 3495-0-IIIPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

—Richard and Ruth Cannon appeal a summary judgment in favor of Seattle-First National Bank establishing liability and awarding damages of $43,000.

Prior to the action for summary judgment, the Cannons were convicted in federal court after a nonjury trial of conspiracy and of aiding and abetting embezzlement of funds from the Seattle-First National Bank. The Cannons' codefendant, Mary Mowery, was convicted of the actual misapplication of the funds. The convictions of the Cannons were affirmed in an unpublished opinion, United States v. Cannon (9th Cir., February 9, 1978).

The bank brought this…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  4. Hurtt v. StironeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. State v. DupardWashington Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API