Legal Opinion
Valdivia v. Davis
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 14, 2002No. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGHPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs sue the Governor of the State of California, and various state correctional officials for allegedly maintaining parole revocation procedures which violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 1 Plaintiffs now move for partial summary judgment on their claim that the State’s unitary parole revocation hearing system is unconstitutional. 2 I resolve the matter on the pleadings and evidence filed herein and after oral argument.
I
FACTS 3
Under California’s system, a.parole officer can impose a hold- if the officer concludes that there is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Valdivia v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- People v. DeLeonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Jacobson v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.