Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Armstrong
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 27, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 86-B-1053PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Pending before me is: 1) Plaintiff Personal Representative’s (PR) Motion for Reconsideration of my July 7, 1989 Order granting defendants leave to amend their, counterclaim; 2) PR’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Respecting Constitutional Challenge to Colorado Probate Code; 3) Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 4) Defendants’ motion for protective order; 5) Defendants’ motion to strike clerk’s certification of judgment; and 6) PR’s motion to dismiss Count III of her Complaint and defendants’ counterclaims. The issues…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Davis Oil Company v. William P. Mills, Iii, William P. Mills, III v. Davis Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Matter of Estate of DaigleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- The Dow Chemical Corporation v. Weevil-Cide Company, Inc. Research Products Company Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Estate of KotowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Estate of Russo v. Sunrise Healthcare Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999