Legal Opinion
The Dow Chemical Corporation v. Weevil-Cide Company, Inc. Research Products Company Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1990No. 88-2045PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee Dow Chemical Corporation (“Dow”) prevailed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas on its claim against defendant-appellants Weevil-Cide Company and Research Products Company (collectively “Research Products” 1 ) for equitable subrogation, and on its claim against defendant-appellant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) for tortious interference with a prospective contractual relation. We reverse both judgments.
BACKGROUND
For many years, Research Products marketed a grain fumigant containing carbon…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Washington Post Company v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Ppx Enterprises, Inc., Mod Music, Inc., and J.H. Records, Inc., Ppx Enterprises, Inc. v. Audiofidelity Enterprises, Inc. And Dante J. PuglieseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- GLENN v. Point Park CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Roberts v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Caroline Herron v. Fannie MaeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- John W. Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Terex Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Mrl Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gama-BastidasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Denver Earl Anderson v. United Telephone Company of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.