Legal Opinion

Davis Oil Company v. William P. Mills, Iii, William P. Mills, III v. Davis Oil Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1989No. 87-4940PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

I

Plaintiff-appellant Davis Oil Company appeals from the judgment of the district court holding that the Due Process Clause of the fourteenth amendment does not require that a foreclosing mortgagee provide actual notice to a mineral lessee whose lease will, under Louisiana law, be extinguished by the seizure and sale of the subject property.

For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A. Facts

The underlying facts of this case are largely undisputed and were found by the district court as follows.

In August of 1977, Kenneth Upton (“Upton”)…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Porter v. Ascension Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Presley v. Mississippi State Hwy. Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Howard L. Wyatt v. Bill Cole, John Robbins, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Guichard Drilling Co. v. Alpine Energy Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API