Legal Opinion

Mareno v. Board of Adjustment of City of Mobile

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 14, 1985No. Civ. 4692PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for involuntary dismissal.

The Marenos applied to the Board of Adjustment for authority to use their residence as a law office. The residence, on Dauphin Street in the city of Mobile, is zoned R-3, multi-family dwellings, and the petitioners wish to use it as B-1 property, buffer business district. The latter is usually an office type area located between residential and business areas.

The Board of Adjustment denied the use variance, and petitioners appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. On trial in the circuit court, after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feaster v. American Liberty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Priest v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Samford v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Chaney v. General Motors Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Mountain Brook v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fitzner Pontiac v. Perkins and Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Board of Zoning Adjus. v. Dauphin UphamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. BOARD OF ADJ. OF MOBILE v. SiglerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. BD. OF ADJ. OF CITY OF MOBILE v. MurphyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Moore v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API