Legal Opinion

Chaney v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 3, 1977No. Civ. 1134PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Manuel Chaney initiated this action when he filed a complaint alleging that the General Motors Corporation sold him an automobile with a warranty that the automobile was "fit for the purpose for which it was sold." He also alleged the automobile was defective when sold because a steering coupling shield had not been installed in the steering mechanism of the car, and as a result of this defect the automobile overturned and he was injured.

The case was tried without a jury. At the conclusion of Chaney's evidence, General Motors orally requested a directed verdict, which was granted. Chaney's…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Ouida J. Weissinger A/K/A Ouida Boyd and Mrs. George Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Emerson Electric Co. v. Guy F. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Manuel Ellis v. Victor M. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Allred v. SasserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. JEFFERSON CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Matthews v. MatthewsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Kent v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Hales v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Greene v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API