Legal Opinion

Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Mountain Brook v. Wright

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 30, 1969No. 6 Div. 536PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment in the circuit court .as the result of a trial de novo appeal under Tit. 37, § 783, Code 1940, from a decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Mountain Brook, which Board, and seventeen property owners are appellants in this court.

The appellees here are Elinor and Harold D. Wright, the owners of one tract of land affected by the proceeding, Mrs. Bryce Streit, the ■ owner of another tract so affected, and Everett Shepherd, Jr., who holds a lease and option on the Streit tract.

Appellees initiated this matter by filing an “Appeal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Turner v. BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Arant v. Board of Adjustment of City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cudd v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Kingsberry Homes Corporation v. RalstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. O'RORKE v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Sanders v. BD. OF ADJ. OF CITY OF CHICKASAWCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Mareno v. Board of Adjustment of City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API