Legal Opinion

Moore v. Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1986No. 85-10PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSTON, Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals’ reversal, 495 So.2d 1109, should be construed as holding only that respondents have established a prima facie case. The strong language of *1113that court’s opinion should not be construed as creating a presumption in respondents’ favor. Variances are disfavored. The remandment is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to put on his evidence. Rule 41(b), Ala.R.Civ.P.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mareno v. Board of Adjustment of City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fitzner Pontiac v. Perkins and Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Board of Zoning Adjus. v. Dauphin UphamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996