Moore v. Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSTON, Justice.
The Court of Civil Appeals’ reversal, 495 So.2d 1109, should be construed as holding only that respondents have established a prima facie case. The strong language of *1113that court’s opinion should not be construed as creating a presumption in respondents’ favor. Variances are disfavored. The remandment is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to put on his evidence. Rule 41(b), Ala.R.Civ.P.
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mareno v. Board of Adjustment of City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fitzner Pontiac v. Perkins and Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Board of Zoning Adjus. v. Dauphin UphamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996