Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Jennings

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1894No. 18278PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

On March 5, 1887, W O. Jennings, Sr'., was appointed guardian of the estate of his minor son, W. 0. Jennings, Jr., and thereafter he duly qualified, and entered upon the discharge of his duties as such guardian.

On the twenty-third day of the same month he received for and on account of his said ward the sum of one thousand dollars in money, which he thereafter held and used until April 9, 1889. On the last-named *151day be executed to bis ward bis promissory note for twelve hundred and four dollars and seventeen cents, being for the said one thousand dollars and interest thereon to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cecil v. BeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  2. Rivard v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. De Levillain v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Spencer v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Wedel v. HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herman v. MortensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hitch v. HitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Martin v. De OrnelasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Berryhill v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API