Legal Opinion

De Levillain v. Evans

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870No. 1,699PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifteenth District, City and County of San Francisco. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCrockett, J.

This is an action in the usual form, by the hems at law of Francis Soto, deceased, to recover a lot in San Francisco, and the answer contains a general denial, coupled with an averment of title in the defendants. The plaintiff’s claim of title is founded on a deed of gift from John Evans (then the owner of the property) to Francis Soto, made in December, 1849, and recorded on the day of its date in the office of the Alcalde. At the time of the execution of the deed, Soto, the grantee, was a minor, twelve or fifteen years of age, residing with his father in a tent on an adjoining lot. *122In 1851…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donner v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Estate of Tetsubumi YanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Scott v. Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API