Legal Opinion

Fitzke v. City of Hastings

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1998No. S-96-787PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

In this equity action, the City of Hastings, Nebraska (Hastings), and the Community Redevelopment Authority of the City of Hastings (Authority) appeal from a judgment entered by the district court for Adams County declaring certain actions taken by them to be invalid and void under Nebraska’s Community Development Law (CDL), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 18-2101 et seq. (Reissue 1991 & Cum. Supp. 1994). Hastings and the Authority contend that the court erred in concluding that Ronald R. Fitzke and Delores Fitzke had standing to challenge their actions and that the court also erred in resolving the merits…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. In Re Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. David Jeffrey Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SilversNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Chambers v. LautenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gordon v. Community First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rath v. City of SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Fackler v. GenetzkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API