Legal Opinion
United States v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 2015No. 14-70486PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, Jr.; Concurrence by Judge WALLACE.
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
The United States has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district judge’s policy restricting the pro hac viee admission of government attorneys. After the petition was filed, the district judge reversed his previous order denying an attorney in this case pro hac vice admission. The United States contends that the district judge’s reversal of his previous order did not render this controversy moot, and requests that we exercise our supervisory and advisory mandamus power to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ozenne v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In Re Ozenne)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Walker River Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Estate of E. Wayne HageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015