Legal Opinion

United States v. Estate of E. Wayne Hage

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 15, 2016No. 13-16974PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

The United States brought this action for damages and injunctive relief against E. Wayne Hage (now deceased) and his son, Wayne N. Hage, alleging that they grazed cattle on federal lands 'without a permit or other authorization. The district court found that, in fact, the Hages had grazed cattle on federal lands without a permit or other authorization. The court nevertheless ruled almost entirely against the government by holding — contrary to longstanding binding precedent — -that the Hages’ water rights provided a defense to the government’s claims of trespass. The…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. 66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 981, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,411 Jane Doe and Mr. Jane Doe v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. HENRY A. v. WilldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Walker River Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. W. Watersheds Project v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
  3. Christianson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023
  4. Garcia v. Unknown PartiesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Ravin Crossbows, LLC v. Hunter's Manufacturing Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API