Legal Opinion

Ozenne v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In Re Ozenne)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 2016No. 11-60039PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

This matter comes before the en banc court on an appeal, filed by Gary Ozenne, from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”). The BAP determined that it had jurisdiction to hear Ozenne’s petition for a writ of mandamus and then denied the petition. However, the BAP did not have jurisdiction to hear Ozenne’s petition. Mandamus was not available to Oz-enne because he filed the petition as a substitute for filing the timely appeal required by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Ozehne’s failure to file a timely appeal jurisdictionally barred…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re JacksonBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Jok v. City of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  3. Canyon Capital Advisors LLC v. PG&E CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Fantasia v. DiodatoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  5. Horton v. PG&E CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API