Legal Opinion
In Re Jensen
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided March 22, 1999No. 15-20524PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
ROBERT E. GRANT, Bankruptcy Judge.
Prior to the 1994 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, there was a dramatic difference of opinion over the consequences of failing to file a proof of claim within the time required, particularly in cases under Chapter 13. The precise topic of this debate was the question of whether a proof of claim had to be timely filed in order to be allowed. One side of the issue, which is best represented by In re Hausladen, 146 B.R. 557 (Bankr.D.Minn.1992) (en banc), argued that § 502(b) listed only eight reasons for not allowing a claim and untimeliness was not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. Cardinal Mine Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In Re HausladenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- In the Matter of Mary Leasure Unroe, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- In Re ZimmermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
- Ebeling v. BobengCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re HoganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
- American General Financial Services, Inc. v. BryanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- In Re BryanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Yasmani Figueredo Aguilar and Farideth Aimee MaldonadoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2025