Legal Opinion
In Re Zimmerman
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided July 1, 1993No. 16-04650PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EN BANC OPINION REGARDING THE ALLOWANCE OF LATE CLAIMS IN CHAPTER 13 PROCEEDINGS
JO ANN C. STEVENSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
I.Introduction.
This court has taken the unusual measure of sitting en banc to decide an unusual issue: whether late claims must be allowed in chapter 13 cases. This question gained attention as the result of another en banc decision, In re Hausladen, 146 B.R. 557 (Bankr.D.Minn.1992). That court made a facially appealing argument that lateness is not a basis for disallowance under 11 U.S.C. § 502(b). However, this panel rejects the interpretation of § 502 espoused by the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- In Re HudsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- Mercado-Boneta v. Administracion Del Fondo De Compensacion Al Paciente Ex Rel. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- In Re John R. Chavis and Betty E. Chavis, Debtors. United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. John R. Chavis and Betty E. ChavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- In Re DennisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.