Legal Opinion

Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. Rigsby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1964No. 314PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

The basis of defendant’s appeal is his contention that plaintiff’s evidence establishes his contributory negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff’s argument is that, notwithstanding his own testimony to the contrary, he offered defendant’s testimony that he had drunk no intoxicants that night and that this conflict in the evidence was for the jury to resolve. Ordinarily this would be true, but plaintiff overlooks the positive allegation in his complaint that at the time of the accident defendant was operating his automobile while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage thereby…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Dinkins v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Tew v. RunnelsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. PainterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Anderson v. AssimosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Carver v. LykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Watson v. CluttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Primerica Life Insurance v. James Massengill & Sons Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API