Legal Opinion

Joe Newton, Inc. v. Tull

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1985No. 8426SC1005PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error (1) the trial court’s failure to rule upon plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ answer, and (2) the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendants. We conclude that neither assignment has merit and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Initially, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in not ruling upon its motion to strike the answer before considering defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff argues that had the trial court allowed the motion to strike the answer, plaintiff would have been entitled to entry of default and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. RigsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Peebles v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ron Medlin Construction v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Hawkins v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Jenco v. Signature Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. RCDI Construction, Inc. v. Spaceplan/Architecture, Planning & Interiors, P.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2001
  5. Ron Medlin Construction v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API