Fisher v. Trumbauer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Washington District Court. — Hon. K. B. Willcockson, Judge. Action in equity to reform deed and recover for shortage, in acreage. There was a counterclaim. On hearing, both petition and counterclaim were dismissed without prejudice to the. beginning or maintenance of an action on either at law. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
On February 10, 1909, plaintiff entered into a written contract with Trumbauer & Smith, a copartnership composed of Charles A. Trumbauer and L. IT. Smith, where-, by he undertook to exchange a stock of hardware and implements located in Wellman for “their farm of two hundred acres located in Jackson county, Iowa, three miles north of Maquoketa . . . to be taken at $60.00 per acre or $12,-000.00,” and “the entire stock to be taken at its original invoice price, and where invoice cannot be shown, same .to be taken at present wholesale price. All furniture and fixtures, consisting of shelving,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Reiger v. TurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Dowell v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Walters v. Farmers BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Boddy v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Smith v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Lutton v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Day v. DyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Howard v. National French Draft Horse Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.