Legal Opinion

Farmers National Bank of Oskaloosa v. Stanton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 3, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Cowrt. — D. W. Hamilton, Judge. Aotion at law to recover from defendants tbe amount alleged to be due to the plaintiff upon a promissory note. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

1- notes factions: oif nonnegotiable cmseSi01toh transfer given, The action is brought upon a promissory note for $5,000 and interest, executed by the defendants and made payable to the order of the Lower System of Merchandising. It bears date of August 23, 1916, and is made payable six thereafter. Embodied in the instrument is a clause as follows:

*434“And we hereby authorize the holder hereof to extend the payment of the same or any part thereof from time to time by reception of interest in advance or otherwise without impairing our several or joint liabilities.”

Alleging that it is the owner of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lutton v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Cedar Rapids National Bank v. WeberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Quinn v. BaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Tabor v. FoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. McCartanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Townsend v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Farmers Savings Bank v. Van Brunt Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. First National Bank v. Galloway Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Second National Bank of New Hampton v. MielitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API