Gorzalski v. Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtMoser, P.J.
Jack and Eileen Gorzalski (the Gorzalskis) appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for damages due to the negligent operation of an automobile by John R. Luebbe, Jr. (Luebbe). The trial court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that sec. 102.03(2), Stats., of the worker’s compensation law provided the exclusive right of recovery for the Gorzalskis. The trial court also held that the coemploye limitation of liability found in Franken-muth Mutual Ins. Co.’s (Frankenmuth) insurance policy did not violate sec. 632.32, Stats. We agree with this latter holding of the trial court and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Peterson v. Natural Resources BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Pigeon v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Laskaris v. City of Wisconsin Dells, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Dahm v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McNeil v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Treat v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Rocker v. USAA Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Harnischfeger Corp v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Harnischfeger Corp v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.