Dahm v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance

Two'issues are raised on this appeal: 1. Is the exclusionary clause relied upon by the defendant insurance company which purports to exclude from coverage a fellow employee of the plaintiff-appellant contrary to public policy and sec. 204.34 (4), Stats., and therefore invalid?

2. Is the exclusionary clause invalid because the policy format did not comply with sec. 204.34 (6), Stats.?

Validity of Exclusionary Clame

The relevant exclusionary clauses of Employers Mutual’s policy follow:

“Exclusions

“This insurance does not apply:

it

“(b) to any obligation for which the insured or any carrier as his…