Solis v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Chief Justice.
Michael Anthony Solis was convicted of felony possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. Solis appeals, claiming the trial court improperly admitted into evidence cash in his possession at the time of arrest, and additionally violated W.R.E. 608(b) by permitting the prosecutor to question Solis about a specific instance of conduct, which Solis asserts was collateral and not directly probative of his truthfulness or untruthfulness. We find the Rule 608(b) claim without merit, but hold the trial court erred in admitting the cash into evidence. We deem this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Barnes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Kolb v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Ryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.