Legal Opinion
Pacific Feed Co. v. Kennel
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1923No. Civ. No. 4335PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
plaintiff sued the defendant to recover a judgment for the purchase price of beet pulp sold and delivered. Judgment was awarded the defendant and the plaintiff has- appealed.
The plaintiff’s complaint alleged that the plaintiff “sold and delivered to defendant goods, wares, and merchandise,” etc. In her answer the defendant pleaded as follows:
“Admits that on the 15th day of December, 1920, defendant ordered from plaintiff three hundred (300) sacks of beet pulp at the agreed price of forty and 50/100 ($40.50) dollars per ton, but denies that the beet pulp delivered by plaintiff to the defendant…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Mangum v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Harris v. BeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lane v. C. A. Swanson & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Harrison v. FryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957